Andrea, does the NetSqlAzManRoleProvider use the WCF cache?

Jul 16, 2010 at 3:16 PM

Or the DB?

How is that configured?

 

Thanks

 

 

 

Jul 16, 2010 at 4:24 PM

Andrea, I just looked at the source and it seems you're using the StorageCache.

I have an idea I want to bounce off you. What if we have another roleProvider that goes against the WCF cache and throws an exception for any operation that cannot be done in the cache (like adding users to roles, etc)?  The reason for this is we may have tons of different ASP.Net/Silverlight apps using this provider and I don't want all of them hitting the db when loading their caches. It'd be nice if they went to 1 centralized WCF cache for their lookups.

What do you think?

Jul 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM

Hi,

for the next release I’m preparing a NetSqlAzManRoleProvider feature that allows you to choose if you want to use the StorageCache class or the WCF Cache Service.

In both cases, write operations are made by NetSqlAzMan DOM and on the Database and then the cache will be invalidated.

Regards,

Andrea.

__________________________________
Andrea Ferendeles
NetSqlAzMan Project Coordinator
E-mail aferende@hotmail.com Web http://netsqlazman.codeplex.com

Jul 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM

Andrea, that sounds fantastic. When do you expect release of that version?

Jul 19, 2010 at 6:40 AM

ASAP.

I think two or three weeks.

Regards,

Andrea.

__________________________________
Andrea Ferendeles
NetSqlAzMan Project Coordinator
E-mail aferende@hotmail.com Web http://netsqlazman.codeplex.com